Does your brain dance with sugarplums at the prospect of being the Sergei Bubka of your admission test?

Well, why not? All that it takes is:

the vaulter........
I.  (A)bility
II. (B)rainpower
III.(C)oaching by Prep Doctor
IV. (D)etermination
V.  (E)nergy for hard work
(A) I only 
(B) II only
(C) III only
(D) IV only
(E) all of the above

If you buy a book on English usage or enroll in a class for ESL (English as a second language), will the instructor be the author of the text? He will if you choose Prep Doctor. He will if you choose...
C3: Cultivating Clear Communication
By Richard J Rome

The mastery of good English usage in speech and writing presents different problems for different individuals. Variations in backgrounds, education, reading habits and associations are some of the primary factors that affect the attainmant of standard written and spoken language skills; perhaps to a considerably greater degree than they affect attainment in most other disciplines. Added to these variations are those of immanent mental abilities; intellectual quotients (IQ's) that affect all learning. Therefore, efficient and successful teaching of standard English usage demands a method that is flexible and individualized - adaptable to the particular needs of each student.

"C 3; Cultivating Clear Communication" provides such a method. One of the guiding principles in its planning and preparation has been that the student should be able first, to discover the points that he himself or she herself has not mastered, second, to concentrate upon them and then, to master them.

"C 3; Cultivating Clear Communication" is not about exponents in mathematics; about fiber optics, about Morse code or about gee-whiz breakthroughs. It is about the mastery of good English, the lingua franca of our world. Once you have become sensitized to the difference between good and substandard English, then you will discover the world around you with new ears and new eyes.

An Example of
SUBSTANDARD ENGLISH USAGE:

I had just arrived to articulate my adurations on the importance of clarity and precision in Standard English when my friend, substandard Sam, sauntered in. After we had concluded our conventional phatic communion, he paused. Lowering his voice just above a whisper, he asked, "What do you think of Donna and I as a duo?"

"That," I replied would be a mistake. Donna and me is more like it."
"You are interested in Donna?"
"I am interested in cultivating clear communication."
"Clear enough," he agreed rather testily. "May the best man win." Then he sighed. "Here I thought that we had a clear path to becoming a very unique duo."
"You could not be a very unique duo, Sam."
"Oh? And why is that?"
"Donna couldn't be very insincere about being a little bit pregnant, could she?"
"Say what? You think that me and Donna . . .?"
"Donna and I."
"Oh." Sam flushed and sank into a chair. "Gosh, I didn't know nothing about it."
"Of course you didn't know anything," I assured him. "Most people don't."
"The reason I feel very badly about this is because . . ."
"You shouldn't say that: The reason I feel bad is that . . ."
"Please, don't," Sam insisted. "If anyone's at fault here, it's me!"